everything on the internet is always Now


This today from Flavorwire:

London-based publisher James Bridle has published every edit made to the Iraq War Wikipedia page between December 2004 and November 2009. It took 12 volumes to include all 12,000 edits made by Wikipedia users in that time. Bridle recently wrote about what he refers to as “the flatness of digital memory,” i.e. the idea that everything on the Internet is always Now. Interestingly, he cites the loss of the now-defunct website-host Geocities (closed to US residents in October of 2009), despite archiving efforts from the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine. Thus, his project, which he calls a Wikipedia Historiography, attempts to give a temporality to how the Iraq War was documented on Wikipedia, which of course is aided by the fact that it’s printed in a hefty load of physical books.

Why Wikipedia? “I talked about Wikipedia because for me, Wikipedia is a useful subset of the entire internet, and as such a subset of all human culture.” However Bridle also relied on Wikipedia’s feature of chronicling the history of every page — in a sense an auto-archiving feature that doesn’t leave anything up to third party sites.

Being true to history, Bridle printed every single edit, no matter how seemingly profane. “It contains arguments over numbers, differences of opinion on relevance and political standpoints, and frequent moments when someone erases the whole thing and just writes ‘Saddam Hussein was a dickhead.’”

Bridle sums up his philosophy nicely when he writes, “Everything should have a history button.”



Straight away I liked this. A new tangent to recording history. (Or is it? I’m not sure.) In any case, this seems to champion (in a way) transparency and consistency. By not letting this ‘history’ fall by the wayside, and through the use of ol’ fashioned paper-and-ink no less, publishers James Bridle have signposted an avenue that lays open for the recording of human existence. Or something.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to “everything on the internet is always Now

  1. Interesting. I wonder about the content of the books–I imagine two factions tugging against the other’s edits until some kind of neutral verbiage is found that is to each side’s liking. But is such neutrality useful? For an encyclopaedia I guess it is, but as a means of living history, I’d prefer to read that time’s books and watch its movies to get an idea for feeling.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s